Asia Healthcare Blog
Exploring the intersection of investment and development, in Asia



Business & Investment

March 12, 2012
1 comment »

What does it mean to say that the majority of China’s population has health insurance?

More articles by »
Written by: Damjan Denoble
Tags: china health reforms and insurance, chinese health insurance, Dr. William Hsiao, health insurance in China, New Cooperative Medical Scheme, , Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance, William Hsiao
china doctors rural health insurance

A WSJ article on the reticence of Chinese hospitals to fall in line with the countries 125 billion dollar health reforms made the rounds this week. The essence of the article is that doctors in China’s public hospitals are driving up the cost of healthcare by prescribing drugs not on the essential drug list and by conducting needless testing in order to maximize fees.

In the past three years, reforms have created a list of “essential drugs” for common illnesses whose prices are fixed at a discount and whose use doesn’t lead to a commission, which has helped lower health-care costs at some hospitals.
Such moves, however, have lowered hospital revenue, which has prompted resistance from hospitals and doctors.
….
Hospitals appear to be shifting away from drugs on the essential list to more expensive drugs and passing the higher costs on to patients, according to research from Dr. Hsiao and his colleagues recently published in the medical journal the Lancet.

“China’s Hospitals Seen Defying Reform,” Wall Street Journal March 9, 2012.

All of this is true, but it should not be news for those of you closely following the healthcare reforms. Doctors everywhere will do what they can to maximize profits where regulatory incentives are misaligned. A toxic regulatory mix of low doctor’s salaries (3500 RMB per month for the best doctors at the best hospitals), a promotion culture that centers on placement at large public hospitals, and below-cost reimbursement system naturally push Chinese doctors to make money on through drug sale commissions.

The more interesting part fo the article is at the end, where Dr. William Hsiao, economic professor at the Harvard School of Public Health makes the following statements about how China’s health insurance program is not keeping pace with the needs of the healthcare system:

According to [Dr.Hsiao's] analysis, around 92% of the Chinese population has some form of insurance coverage, slightly below Chinese government claims, though the coverage for many is limited. “The strategy is: get everyone covered, then deepen the coverage,” said Dr. Hsiao.
However, he said the inability to successfully curb costs at hospitals could have trickle-down effects for insurance coverage.
“When the public hospitals, which are the mainstay of the provision for health care in China, are for-profit institutions, they will use every possible means to get money out of the patients or the insurance, so the insurance fund is going to have a tough time to sustain itself,” said Dr. Hsiao.
Dr. Hsiao is right, and to understand why you have to understand why 92% insurance coverage would not be enough for the insurance fund to sustain itself if public hospitals were to start becoming for-profit hospitals en masse. This is critical issue for both policy wonks and investors, and the crux of the issue is this: most of the people “covered” by social insurance under the receive little or no benefits under that coverage, even though the coverage is voluntary. This is because NCMS is set up so that “hospital expenses are usually reimbursed after the patient has covered all costs, so  a patient who cannot afford treatment in the first place will not benefit from the programme. Furthermore, the reimbursement rates are quite low…”.
[space]
Therefore, if hospitals become more expensive, and the insurance fund does nothing to help those costs, people will opt out and the insurance program that covers more than 54% of China’s population will collapse. China’s health policy makers are aware of this, and that’s why experimental payment models are being set up throughout the country to see how else insurance payments could be made to work.
Yes, there are complications with the Urban Basic Medical Insurance plans as well (there are multiple Urban Basic plans now), but these have to do more with the plans covering too much than not enough. The immediate danger is the NCMS.

Insurance Refresher Course

As a quick policy refresher course, the basic structure of China’s insurance program is a two pronged division. On one prong are the urban residents (45.7% of the population according to the National Bureau of Statistics of China) and on the other prong are the rural residents (the remaining 54.3%).  These two groups are covered by different health insurance regulatory schemes. Urban residents are covered by the “Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance” and the “Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance”. Rural residents are covered by the aforementioned New Cooperative Medical Scheme.

 



About the Author

Damjan Denoble
Damjan co-founded Asia Healthcare Blog with James Flanagan, in 2009. He is currently a JD/MA dual-degree student in Law and Chinese Studies, at the University of Michigan Law School. He lived and worked in China for two and a half years, and clerked at the offices of Harris & Moure, a leading boutique international law firm, widely admired for its China Law Blog. He graduated from Duke University in 2007, with a BA in Public Policy, concentration in health policy, and is an alumnus of the Middlebury College Chinese Language School.


1 comment »


One Comment


  1. [...] health services should be expanded as medical care becomes more accessible in rural China. As the New Cooperative Medical Scheme continues to develop, it will be particularly beneficial to include mental health services in [...]



Leave a Reply